• Home +
    • Associate Journalist
    • Donation
    • Justice Watch Today
    • Donate | Subscribe | Contact
    • Custody 4 Cash
    • Past IG Issues
    • Buffalo Head Media
    • IG Current Issues
    • About
  • Transparency
  • Environmental
  • National Parks
  • Topic to Topic
INDEPENDENT GAZETTE
  • Home +
    • Associate Journalist
    • Donation
    • Justice Watch Today
    • Donate | Subscribe | Contact
    • Custody 4 Cash
    • Past IG Issues
    • Buffalo Head Media
    • IG Current Issues
    • About
  • Transparency
  • Environmental
  • National Parks
  • Topic to Topic
Picture

REPRESENTATIVES

Dear Representatives,
There are moments when the public looks to its elected officials not simply for governance—but for clarity, courage, and leadership.
We are in one of those moments.

In light of renewed national scrutiny surrounding the Epstein files, and here in Pennsylvania, the lasting shadow of the “Kids for Cash” scandal—alongside ongoing public concern over what many have come to call “Custody for Cash”—confidence in our judicial system has been shaken.
The court system is meant to be our society’s safeguard—protecting the public, upholding rights, and ensuring fairness when it matters most. But even a safeguard must have accountability. When proceedings happen entirely out of view, it leaves a question that cannot be ignored:

Who is watching the system meant to protect us?

House Bill 1397, introduced by Rep. Jamie Flick (R), addresses the use of cameras in courtrooms and represents a measured, practical step toward transparency and accountability. It offers a way forward—one that allows the public to see that the system works as it should, and when it does not, that it can be held to account.

This legislation does not call for a public “free-for-all” or spectacle. It offers something far more responsible—a controlled, accountable record. A “black box” approach, where proceedings can be reviewed if disputes arise, creates clarity, protects all parties, and reinforces trust in outcomes.
We urge you to co-sponsor and support House Bill 1397—without delay and without hesitation.

Let this be the moment the House chooses openness over silence. Show Pennsylvanians—especially those who have felt wronged by a potentially unjust, closed system—that you are committed to fairness.

With this step, the truth will have nowhere to hide: if concerns are unfounded, transparency will reveal it; if there is injustice, it will come to light. Everyone benefits when the process is open, and trust is restored.

You may follow this effort at theindependentgazette.org, where this issue and others impacting transparency and accountability will be tracked.

This is an opportunity to lead—to stand visibly for fairness, for accountability, and for the restoration of public trust.

We ask you to join in that effort.
Respectfully,

SENATE 

Dear State Senator,

We urge you to introduce and advance a Senate companion bill—without delay and without hesitation- for House Bill 1397, introduced by Rep. Jamie Flick (R), which addresses the use of cameras in courtrooms and represents a measured, practical step toward transparency and accountability.

It offers a way forward—one that allows the public to see that the system works as it should, and when it does not, that it can be held to account.

This is a moment that calls for action.
In light of renewed national scrutiny surrounding the Epstein files, and here in Pennsylvania, the lasting impact of the “Kids for Cash” scandal—alongside continued public concern regarding what many refer to as “Custody for Cash”—confidence in our judicial system has been shaken.

Trust cannot be restored behind closed doors.
Introducing and advancing a Senate companion bill that mirrors the intent of House Bill 1397. This is more than a procedural step—it’s a clear statement to your constituents that fairness should be visible, not assumed, and that restoring trust matters.

This legislation does not call for a public “free-for-all” or spectacle. It offers something far more responsible—a controlled, accountable record. A “black box” approach, where proceedings can be reviewed if disputes arise, creates clarity, protects all parties, and reinforces trust in outcomes.

With this step, the truth will have nowhere to hide: if concerns are unfounded, transparency will reveal it; if there is injustice, it will come to light. Everyone wins when the process is open, and trust is restored.

We will maintain and publish a public record of where each representative—and their challengers—stand on this issue.

This is not done in opposition, but in service to clarity. Constituents deserve to know where their leaders stand when it comes to the integrity of the courts.

You may follow this effort at theindependentgazette.org, where this issue and others impacting transparency and accountability will be tracked.

Respectfully, 

​SUPPORT HB 1397

Transparency. Accountability. Protection for Families.HB 1397 is a bipartisan effort to increase transparency and accountability in Pennsylvania’s courts— helping protect families, expose harmful patterns, and restore public trust where it matters most.

Current Sponsors & Co-Sponsors
Watch video on YouTube
Donate
Click to hear Sanity Check's 2014 Interview with Bruce Levine

Protecting children matters. Strong courts matter. Accountability matters too.
What happens when the system falls short?

Bruce Levine | February 1, 2014 — Sanity Check Archives

Five years fighting for his children, Bruce Levine joined The Independent Gazette and others, dubbing “Custody for Cash.”

Concerns were raised in 2014. For many, this is still happening.
Go to theindependentgazette.org to see how you can help!

Why HB 1397 Matters

Court decisions shape lives—especially for children and families. When transparency is limited, accountability weakens and trust breaks down. HB 1397 helps bring visibility to a system that affects thousands of Pennsylvanians every year.

This bill supports oversight, discourages harmful practices, and ensures that decisions are made with greater public awareness. Transparency is not optional—it is protection.

Supporting HB 1397 means standing for fairness, accountability, and the right of families to understand and trust the system that impacts their lives.

DEMAND TRANSPARENCY
PROTECT CHILDREN
SUPPORT REFORM
STAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

Help Keep This Work Going

Your support helps us continue raising awareness, sharing critical information, and pushing for meaningful reform. Every contribution makes a difference.
They said it couldn’t happen again.
After the horrors of the Kids for Cash scandal in Northeast Pennsylvania, people believed the system had been exposed… and fixed.

But it wasn’t.

A second wave—quieter, harder to see—has been unfolding. It’s called “Custody for Cash.”

Families enter the court system looking for help, fairness, or protection. Instead, some find themselves caught in a system where court-involved agencies can gain unchecked access to children—with little oversight, little transparency, and devastating consequences.

These aren’t the poorest families. And they’re not the most powerful.
They are the ones in between--with enough resources to be targeted… but not enough to fight back.

The Independent Gazette has been here before.

We were there when the truth behind “Kids for Cash” first came to light.
And today, through our nonprofit initiative, Justice Watch, we are again working to bring what’s hidden into the open.

Because sunlight is still the only thing that stops corruption.
Right now, there is a chance to act.

HB 1397, a bipartisan effort introduced by Pennsylvania lawmakers, aims to restore transparency, accountability, and oversight to a system that desperately needs them. It would create real visibility--a watchlist, safeguards, and a path forward.

But legislation doesn’t move on its own.
It moves when people demand it.

Your support helps us:
  • Investigate and expose what others won’t
  • Raise public awareness across Pennsylvania
  • Reach lawmakers and push for real reform
  • Protect families who don’t have a voice

Stand with us.
Donate today to support transparency in Pennsylvania’s courts.
Help us shine a light where it matters most.
Help us make sure this never happens again.


Support Transparency

About HB 1397

House Bill 1397House Bill 1397 is a proposal in the 2025–2026 Pennsylvania General Assembly that would amend Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to allow video and audio recording of criminal and civil court proceedings, with certain exceptions. It was introduced by Rep. Jamie Flick and referred to the House Judiciary Committee on May 1, 2025. 

Key facts
  • Chamber: Pennsylvania House of Representatives
  • Session: 2025–2026 Regular Session 
  • Prime sponsor: Rep. Jamie Flick (R-Lycoming/Union) 
  • Statute affected: Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) 
  • Committee of referral: House Judiciary Committee 

Purpose and scope: The bill’s stated objective is to increase transparency and accountability in Pennsylvania courts by permitting cameras—both video and audio recording—in criminal and civil proceedings. The sponsor has framed it as a deterrent to “dishonest or corrupt behavior” by anyone involved in the proceedings, arguing that public visibility will improve trust in the judicial process. 

Exceptions and limitations: House Bill 1397 is not an unlimited “cameras everywhere” authorization. The text, as described by the sponsor’s release, includes specific exceptions where recording would not be permitted—for example, certain sensitive proceedings or circumstances where recording could jeopardize safety, privacy, or fair-trial rights. The exact carve-outs and technical details (who may record, how recordings are stored, etc.) are defined in the bill language and would be critical for implementation. 
​

Legislative status: As of its introduction in early May 2025, the bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee and awaits further action, such as hearings, amendments, or a committee vote, before it can move to the full House, then the Senate, and finally the governor for signature or veto. 
Donate
Sources | Transparency in Pennsylvania Courts

The Independent Gazette


Policies

Disclaimers
All Policies
Privacy Policy
​
All Rights Reserved ​© 2012
Picture
  • Home +
    • Associate Journalist
    • Donation
    • Justice Watch Today
    • Donate | Subscribe | Contact
    • Custody 4 Cash
    • Past IG Issues
    • Buffalo Head Media
    • IG Current Issues
    • About
  • Transparency
  • Environmental
  • National Parks
  • Topic to Topic